Mapping the Path to Sustainable Education: Critical Dimensions of Locally–Established Higher Education Institutions

Abstract

This study examines critical dimensions of higher education and their performance in locally-established higher education institutions (HEIs). The research findings indicate that administration, mission, and planning are the highest-performing dimensions, followed by operations and student opportunities. However, curriculum, faculty and staff development and rewards, research and scholarship, and outreach and service demonstrate regular performance. The qualitative analysis reveals several important conclusions. Firstly, the Vision, Mission, Goals, and Objectives (VMGO) of the HEIs align with sustainability commitments. Secondly, these institutions prioritize employee involvement in decision-making, provide appropriate status and benefits, and shape academic disciplines based on core values, showing engagement with social and ecological systems. Thirdly, only a small percentage of faculty members focus on teaching or researching sustainability issues. Additionally, participants acknowledge a significant gap between their institutions and ideal campus models practiced by established universities in the country. These universities actively support the government's clean and green program through projects and research. The adoption of the Strategic Performance Monitoring System (SPMS) and budget appropriations for faculty development programs are noted. Locally-established HEIs contribute to sustainable community development through partnerships with schools, local governments, and businesses. Participants engage in sustainability-related training and conferences. The institutions have dedicated offices for linkages and placement and conduct outreach programs in specific communities. Students actively participate through student councils, Go Green Project Teams, and college clubs. This research sheds light on the performance and commitment of locally established HEIs toward sustainability and highlights areas for improvement to align with the practices of established universities.