Role Of Intellectual Property Theories in Addressing Anomalies Created By The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Rights: An Analysis

Abstract

Globally, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) is expanding exponentially. The issue of managing intellectual property in AI is raised by this surge. Discussions and moderating have taken place, but no resolution has been reached. The issue of whether the work created by an AI should get a special status still exists. When it comes to the control of IPR in artificial intelligence, there are a few oddities. The ownership of patents and copyrights is in doubt, and there are serious worries about the consequences of violation. With the development of technology, there is no certainty on the law, despite existing international accords and conventions. In the absence of artificial intelligence (AI), intellectual property (IP) rules have, up to this point, treated IP as a product of human cognition. The current boom in AI, which has seen the development of IP from the "intelligence" of software, has upended this base. But the non availability of law on works created by artificial intelligence the law is left far behind to deal with the anomalies created by the intersection of “Artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights”. This research paper examines the role of intellectual property theories in addressing AI anomalies, focusing on copyright, patent, and trademark laws. It analyzes utilitarianism, labour theory  and personality theory, examining authorship and ownership in AI-generated works and potential conflicts between human creators and machine-generated content. In this research paper researcher(s) will- Analyse various theories of Intellectual properties to tackle the anomolities created by the intersection of IPR and AI. Criticize and suggest changes in the theories to make them helpful for emerging frameworks on AI and IPR.